Clippers Topbuzz
Post new topic   Reply to topic
← JJ Redick Is Special For Us Log in to check your private messages → Free Agents Ideas/News for Clippers
Author   
ClipperPostman
Post ID: 418310by ClipperPostman » Dec 03, 2013 - 07:41 PM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 948
Reputation: 38.1Reputation: 38.1 Rep Post +1
votes: 12

As a person who had tendinitis multiple times I can tell you it's not that simple. There are so many different things that can contribute to tendinitis that its impossible to narrow it down to one thing.

I can tell you one thing tho. It's a terrible condition, which I don't see how he is even out there playing with it. Literally when it flames up it can feel like your tendons are about to snap in half.



                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418311by Agent0 » Dec 03, 2013 - 08:40 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

You aren't saying anything different from me joe. "Can contribute" is basically what I said "may increase risk", those are terms that can be used to mean a similar thing by different people medically.

What I'm saying is that weight does not "cause" tendonitis. Weight issues are more likely to cause arthritis in joints, not tendonitis.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418315by Agent0 » Dec 03, 2013 - 09:33 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

I was anticipating the Phoenix medical staff (or stuff?) response, and that is fair, they are known as being good, but obviously it's hard to believe that a couple months removed from being in Phoenix his body now just starts breaking down.

The tanking is true about some teams, but what we want to know is whether that's what Phoenix was doing. Was Dudley playing on a team trying to loose? Was Phoenix with Nash trying to tank? If not, why is lottery or not relevant?

Dudley didn't play PF in Phoenix. I didn't forget about him playing PF in Phoenix because it didn't happen. Phoenix used Dudley as a SF/SG. Charlotte used him as a PF primarily, which is why his rebounding numbers were higher there. Dudley rarely played PF in Phoenix, if you have some proof of it, I'd like so see, but I hardly saw him playing PF. What I saw was Grant Hill at PF when Phoenix was trying to play small ball. I remember their fans talking about how he was so much better defensively in 2009 and 2010 when he played more SF and less SG than in 2011 when it switched to primarily SG because of his lack of foot speed.

Define "horrible" for Barnes, do you mean the horrible playoffs after he suffered an ankle injury, or what is the horrible you are referring to? Horrible in comparison to how Barnes usually plays, or in comparison to?

I agree, Barnes is best in transition, that was never denied, but you can't score layups all game. Problem with that conclusion that it is the issue he's had this year is that this team, especially the starting line-up is getting out in transition more than previous years. We can see it, the pace numbers confirm it (19th to 9th). Also his splits confirm similar early to late clock offense for him, just that in 8 games this year his eFG% in early clock is 41.7% compared to 62% last season. So lack of transition opportunities doesn't logically conclude.

I'm going to take a stab at what Barnes issue is: 1) and I said it in the off-season, he is 33 years old, can't really expect the production to keep going, so I wasn't the biggest fan of the re-signing not because I didn't like him, but he's not young 2) ----

    Barnes said after the initial injury healed right before camp started, he got hurt again two days into training camp.

    He got his first real good practice Thursday after missing games and practices for about three weeks. "So, it's been like a good two months since I've really got to play basketball," Barnes said. "It'll take a little bit. But like I've said, I have to keep working on my conditioning and just find the balance in my shot. I missed some open shots, but I really don't have any worries." http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/26/sports/la-sp-sn-matt-barnes-cl ippers-return-20131025

That's a bigger deal for a 33 year old than a 25 year old for example.

                
      Back to top
ClipperKyle32
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418316by ClipperKyle32 » Dec 03, 2013 - 09:39 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 1608
Rep Post +1
votes: 16

Did anyone see Ariza yesterday? I like that guy a lot! I remember when Sterling turned down that Caron Butler-Trevor Ariza trade! I wonder if he would turn down a Jared Dudley-Trevor Ariza trade? Not implying trade Dudley but I wonder if Sterling would turn that down as well

                
      Back to top
DocHollywood
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418320by DocHollywood » Dec 03, 2013 - 09:55 PM PST
Posts: 327
Location: Honolulu
Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Did it occur to anyone that Jared has maybe gained a few pounds as a result of the tendinitis, not the other way around? He is being told to rest and relax the knee when not playing in games, otherwise it will worsen.

                
      Back to top
pageC4
Post ID: 418321by pageC4 » Dec 03, 2013 - 09:57 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 4142

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 19

I was shocked when I heard about that trade. Especially the age differences between the two, and Washington was about to do the trade. I don't think we get the same interest in Dudley though, but if we do I wonder if the front office would do it.

                
      Back to top
ClippersDA
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418322by ClippersDA » Dec 03, 2013 - 10:24 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2457
Rep Post +1
votes: 6

Ariza would be perfect! So mad sterling killed it.

                
      Back to top
pageC4
Post ID: 418324by pageC4 » Dec 03, 2013 - 10:34 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 4142

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 19

Sterling is Sterling. His reputation precedes him. The best thing he has done the past couple of years is set his pride aside and let his front office do their jobs. Still can't wait to see the franchise in better hands.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418326by Agent0 » Dec 03, 2013 - 10:58 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Ariza has been a guy I've vouched for, outside of durability issues, he would be a nice fit. Dudley doesn't work contract wise

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418328by Agent0 » Dec 03, 2013 - 11:12 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

    Skewed info if I'm trying to prove that he was some star, I wasn't. We are talking about what kind of team he played for, so the context of the conversation is important. jarca was saying that Dudley was playing on lottery teams with a negative implication of his ability to play on a good team. Usually the implications that come with that are:
      -playing bad basketball -not playing team basketball (therefore can't fit on a good team) -padding stats -not playing defense and hustling

    Firstly, those aren't things we can attribute to Dudley in Phoenix. Then, even on an actual bottom of the barrel team last year, the guy was still playing good "proper" basketball. Taking proper shots, making the extra pass, hustling, defending, so the whole point he was trying to make from that doesn't really work.

    We don't determine value, importance or contribution to a team purely based on raw stats though. Still, he was playing half the game for them both in the regular season and in 16 playoff games where he hit 1.6 3's/game on 42%, had a .620 TS% and 130 Ortg. Gomes played on a team that never even got to 25 wins while he was there. Dudley on the other hand has played 1 less playoff game than Blake Griffin and 16 less total playoff minutes than DJ!

    He was on one playoff team btw, they didn't make the playoffs in the 46 win season. This discussion is a good example of poor use of statistics. Looking at the win/loss stat or the conference seeding stat and determining what kind of basketball a team was playing or how certain players were playing ("good" or "bad" basketball) is just not accurate. It's as inaccurate as the assumption that every player on a team that won is playing winning basketball.

"One thing that is alarming about his numbers was the more minutes he got how little his rebounding and assisting increased."

    Should they have increased more? He maintained the same rate of rebounding, I don't understand what you mean here. I think you have the wrong expectations of increase. Also assists are dependent on role as much as passing ability. So if Dudley wasn't being used as a playmaker, he's not going to get assists. Good role players understand their role and don't try to do too much, that's why they are good role players. Bad role players are the ones who get turnovers and shoot poor percentages b/c they are trying to do too much.

      08-09 to 12-13: 15.2 MPG: 11.7 REB% / 7.0 AST% 24.3 MPG: 8.0 REB% / 7.9 AST% 26.1 MPG: 8.6 REB% / 7.6 AST% 31.1 MPG: 8.4 REB% / 8.8 AST% 27.5 MPG: 6.4 REB% / 14.9 AST%
    Doesn't seem like there's a pattern there of decreasing with more mins. His rebounding stays in the same range except for last season, but he played more minutes in 11-12, so it isn't because of increased minutes, actually the opposite. His AST% was in the same range then increased after Nash left because he was doing more playmaking.

    I'm interested to know how you were interpreting the numbers to come to those conclusions you had. If you are talking about Phoenix vs Charlotte, he played PF in Charlotte, so yea, he would be getting more rebounds then.

"It's interesting though how few shot attempts which brings in the criticism that he is mainly a wide open jumper shooter and struggles to create off the dribble or even to score when contested (instead of a shot attempt he will pass off the ball but still has a very low assist average)."

    A lot of this sounds questionable. Dudley is a 4th/5th option, he SHOULD have relatively few shot attempts. When did anyone think the Clippers were acquiring a shot creator in Dudley? With that said, the past 3 seasons, 11.0 FGA/36 (0.31 FGA/minute) and 14.5 pts/36 (0,40 pts/min), not sure why anyone would expect him to be shooting or scoring more than that for his role.

    There's a difference between "passing the ball off" and "creating shots", so passing off bad shots, or you know, "smart basketball", what he should be doing as a role player isn't necessarily going to get assists.

    A role players unwillingness to take bad or overly contested shots is a good thing, not a criticism. I don't know about his personal contested vs uncontested percentages, but the whole point of contesting shots is that it makes it lower percentage. I can't think of a good coach that wants his role players to be taking contested shots or trying to do more than they can in creating off the dribble. That sends players to the bench.

    Interestingly enough, Dudley actually has a good one dribble pull up, can also use the screen and roll to get free and make a shot, and has been able to get oppurtunities near the basket for himself. He isn't a "shot" creator in the on ball sense and shouldn't be aspiring to try and be one.

    Back to assists, you have to create to get volume assists. 1) Dudley played with Nash, so there's no reason for him to be creating much, 2) the one year without Nash he had a 3.4 assists/36 assist rate. Right now per 36 on the Clippers, outside of Paul, only Collison (4.1 assists/36) and Crawford (3.6 assists/36) are higher than his assist rate last season. For the fact that he's not fast, not some exceptional ball handler, etc, 3.4 assists/36 is quite GOOD, not bad.

    For comparison, Caron Butler averaged 1.5 assists/36 as a Clipper (both years), and this year is at 1.8 assists/36 for Milwaukee. Dudley averaged 2.0 assists/36 the three previous years with Nash.

The other problem with his game is his ft shooting % of 74% is very low for an "elite shooter.

    He's an elite shooter from the field. Career .580 TS%, 40.3 3PT%, and in a down year he's well above league average TS% with .564 TS% and above league average 3PT% (36.2%) with 37.1%.

    Lastly, his "best stats" are actually extremely good for a role player. This is the problem with knowing how to find and look at stats and understanding them. A lot of what you are saying seems like you don't get the stats here or don't get the relation between minutes and production and the importance of efficiency from role players. I'm not sure what kind of production you think $4M/year 4th/5th option role players put out.

    What's your idea of good stats for a player like this and in how many minutes, just so we get an idea of the expectations?


If he does continue to struggle due to injury, then the acquisition didn't pan out for this year. We'll just have to look to Jeff Green last year for hope. The guy was pretty bad for about 40 games last season, people were laughing at Boston, then for the last half of the season though, there was no more laughing.

                
      Back to top
clipperboy24
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418338by clipperboy24 » Dec 04, 2013 - 05:02 AM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 4659
Reputation: 411.3 Rep Post +1
votes: 37

^^^ agent, no offense but I obviously have a different opinion and just because I do doesn't mean I don't know how to use stats or what stats to look at. His rebounding is very poor and his assist level is very poor. If he isn't going to contribute too much as a 4th/5th option scoring wise then he should have something else to contribute rebounding, assist, spacing, defensively. The interesting thing about Dudley's game? There is very little movement which doesn't increase spacing as much as a Redick type player and also the fact that the defense can collapse on him quickly and he won't usually attempt a shot or some other move outside of passing, IMO (key part) nullifies the "fact" that he is an elite shooter because he won't often use that "Elite" skill.

So if all he truly has to pin his hat on is high shoot % but at a low shooting rate, then that is not much especially if he becomes any type of defensive liability which blearily he is now. So far, to me, he is proving to be Gomes 2.0 as Jarca said and I don't think one or two good games from him out of 20 is even worth the $4.25mm.

I wish he was anywhere near as good as Jeff Green, so that kind of turnaround can only happen when someone actually has legit potential. But I don't even think if Dudley averages his 12 PPG, 4 RPG and 2 apg from last year (his best season) those really aren't even great #s from a role player who is also a mediocre to decent defender. It's about the complete player picture. I think a big reason Dudley was brought in was for a locker room presence/glue type guy but I don't think that is enough to overcome his other shortcomings. Again this is my opinion just like you have an opinion, both of us have used stats I in no way have manipulated the stats either so please do not insinuate this.

Right now, due to a number of reasons, to me its very clear that Reggie Bullock should be getting heavier minutes than an injured Dudley and if he keeps showing potential and realizing it, even more than a healthy Dudley.

                
      Back to top
clipperboy24
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418339by clipperboy24 » Dec 04, 2013 - 05:06 AM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 4659
Rep Post +1
votes: 37

Also, you listed the implications of playing for a team like Phoenix and the funny thing is, they really were a very bad team defensively, didn't play very good team basketball, and struggled across the board. This was why Marcin Gortat wanted to get out of there. They were a rebuilding wasteland, so he never has proved how much he can contribute to a true contender because he really didn't contribute that much to the WCF Suns team even though he played 24.5 Mpg.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post ID: 418344by jarca » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:48 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7373

rp.gif

Reputation: 564.6 Rep Post +1
votes: 35

Nash wasn't trying to tank but it's quite evident that after the all star break that their chances are slim. Nobody tries to tank right in the beginning of the season. But like I mentioned, the last 20 games or so it's a free for all system. Dudley didn't play "power forward" the way Amare did in Phoenix but in spurts he would guard the opposing team's big men. But in offense you're right he didn't play power forward much in comparison to the way Boris Diaw or even Tim Thomas played. I define horrible for Barnes that he's playing like the Lakers Matt Barnes. If you say that Matt Barnes' age may be due to his age so wouldn't that go back to value? Why sign someone at 3 per year when he's up there in age?

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418345by jarca » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:51 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7373

rp.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

Agent, LMAO, Dudley isn't going to have a season resurgence like Green. He has zero potential athletic wise as Green.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418348by Agent0 » Dec 04, 2013 - 11:06 AM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

You're way too concerned about how athletic a player is. Production isn't tied to athletic ability. Shooting better, being able to get lower to the ground, rebounding better would men Dudley is playing better, don't know what being athletic has to do with anything.

This has nothing to do with comparing Dudley as a player to Green, but about a player struggling early and picking it up later.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418349by Agent0 » Dec 04, 2013 - 11:25 AM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

I understand what it means for him to play PF, lol, but what I'm telling you is that they did not use Dudley as a PF in small ball lineups. Just because you say so doesn't mean it happened. I went to check at both 82games and basketball-reference and they also confirmed that he played like 95%+ of his minutes at SF and SG.

Really insignificant to be saying he played PF if he played 1 minute every two games at PF. What's that, like 41 minutes over a season? Lol. They used Hill as their 4 when they went smaller. Dudley played SF/SG for Phoenix, so no, it's not the same as Gomes in that respect.

I didn't like the Matt Barnes signing because of his age, never said I liked it. That doesn't mean Deng is better than 3 average to above average players. It means that the Clippers didn't use that money effectively. Of course it is a moot point since it is hypothetical and it's not like there was some trade for Deng prevented by acquiring these guys.

Barnes played quite well as a Laker and was making <1M. If you think his play as a Laker was horrible for him, you must think he's more than a role player. He played about as well as a Laker as he had his whole career. Seems like people are still projecting his playoff struggles after being injured as how his whole season went.

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418350by tense2 » Dec 04, 2013 - 11:31 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8137
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

^Some people favor athleticism over skill set because it "looks" better. I'll take skill set every time over athleticism. The best case scenario is if the player has both of those qualities.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post ID: 418351by jarca » Dec 04, 2013 - 11:32 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7373

rp.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

If you mean picking it up by averaging 10 points instead of 8? How can Dudley realistically pick up his game. It's not like he's going to average 5 rebounds. He didn't even do that on an 8 seconds or less offense. Is he going to be a great facilitator or of the sudden. The guy has no handles.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post ID: 418352by jarca » Dec 04, 2013 - 11:37 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7373

rp.gif

Reputation: 564.6 Rep Post +1
votes: 35

Well you used Barnes when talking about value. So even you would agree that Barnes doesn't have much value for his contract? So that leaves Dudley who we have to "wait" so he can have a green type resurgence. So that leaves Redick who was performing well and 2 overpaid guys?

So what's wrong with Deng at the 3 spot and maybe Bullock at the 2 spot

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 418365by clipper*joe » Dec 04, 2013 - 03:05 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14818
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Athleticism and skill set are not mutually exclusive. LBJ, Westrook, Durant, Rose, Wade, BG, and most of the best players depend more on athleticism than skill set. Not saying that they don't have any but these guys "look" better when their athleticism is displayed in a vulgar way. And usually, it's their athleticism that enables them to build a skill set better than players that are not so gifted in the athletic department.

                
      Back to top
Silasie
Post ID: 418366by Silasie » Dec 04, 2013 - 03:10 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 1797

uk.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Athleticism and skill set are not mutually exclusive. LBJ, Westrook, Durant, Rose, Wade, BG, and most of the best players depend more on athleticism than skill set. Not saying that they don't have any but these guys "look" better when their athleticism is displayed in a vulgar way. And usually, it's their athleticism that enables them to build a skill set better than players that are not so gifted in the athletic department.

True, you can't really separate one from the other.

                
      Back to top
ClipperPostman
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418367by ClipperPostman » Dec 04, 2013 - 04:15 PM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 948
Rep Post +1
votes: 12

So are you guys saying DUDley is the new bobby simmons?

                
      Back to top
worm
Post ID: 418375by worm » Dec 04, 2013 - 05:34 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1089
Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Nope he is a lot better than Simmons.

                
      Back to top
CP3Heliflopter
Post ID: 418377by CP3Heliflopter » Dec 04, 2013 - 06:08 PM PST
CTB MVP X2


Posts: 5572
Rep Post +1
votes: 10

Sure if your talking about the 24-25 years old version. Razz

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post ID: 418414by tense2 » Dec 04, 2013 - 07:15 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8137
Reputation: 531 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Athleticism and skill set are not mutually exclusive. LBJ, Westrook, Durant, Rose, Wade, BG, and most of the best players depend more on athleticism than skill set. Not saying that they don't have any but these guys "look" better when their athleticism is displayed in a vulgar way. And usually, it's their athleticism that enables them to build a skill set better than players that are not so gifted in the athletic department.

Those 6 players you've named all have above average to an elite type of athleticism that plays very well with their skill set obviously. That's the best case scenario I previously mentioned. Having that type of athleticism does not win games by itself as many current NBA players, lottery picks and slam dunk champions can attest.

There are plenty of skilled and effective players who "only" possess the "baseline" athleticism required to play at the NBA level. Quick example of such would be Kevin Love on the top end and Reggie Evans on the other end. HOF'rs who didn't do too bad in their careers without that "other" type of athleticism; Larry Bird, Kevin McHale and the notorious Bill Laimbeer just to name a few.

Anyway If looks do it for you, that's fine. I prefer results since putting the ball in the basket still counts for the same amount of points whether it looks good or ugly. Same can be said about rebounding or playing defense.

P.S. Love the Straw man sign though, but be careful as objects in the mirror are closer then they appear.

                
      Back to top
clippersforlife33
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418467by clippersforlife33 » Dec 04, 2013 - 07:59 PM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 445
Rep Post +1
votes: 0

im pretty disappointed with dudley. the fact that the phoenix suns pretty much only gave up dudley for bledsoe is still mind boggling.

                
      Back to top
what_up_clipnation83
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418496by what_up_clipnation83 » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:16 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2015
Location: N/S LBC
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 3

Our team shoots dumb shots sometimes

                
      Back to top
what_up_clipnation83
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418499by what_up_clipnation83 » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:17 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2015
Location: N/S LBC
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 3

Dudley sucks, I wish we would've did the Ariza butler trade lady year

                
      Back to top
what_up_clipnation83
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418505by what_up_clipnation83 » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:22 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2015
Location: N/S LBC
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 3

2nd game in a row a circus last second 3 goes in

                
      Back to top
what_up_clipnation83
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418526by what_up_clipnation83 » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:33 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2015
Location: N/S LBC
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 3

This is the worst game I've seen the Clippers play this season.

                
      Back to top
Akclipps
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418576by Akclipps » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:52 PM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 412
Rep Post +1
votes: 6

Dudley sucks

                
      Back to top
pageC4
Post ID: 418581by pageC4 » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:53 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 4142

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 19

Well, it's hindsight now. We're stuck with him. The only thing to save this season is a trade. I just don't see this team getting better.

                
      Back to top
CP3Heliflopter
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418582by CP3Heliflopter » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:55 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 5572
Rep Post +1
votes: 10

I am honestly fed up with his poor play. Wish Barnes comes back quickly.

                
      Back to top
Clippers_FTW
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418585by Clippers_FTW » Dec 04, 2013 - 08:59 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3758

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 9

Just put in Bullock.. I think he's better lol

                
      Back to top
pageC4
Post ID: 418594by pageC4 » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:11 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 4142

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 19

The upside on Bullock is that even if he has a bad game its going to be attributed to him being a rookie, and after every bad performance we can expect him to learn from it. Where as with Dudley the guy is a veteran and has probably reached his pinnacle as a player.

                
      Back to top
CP3Heliflopter
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418595by CP3Heliflopter » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:14 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 5572
Rep Post +1
votes: 10

If only we traded Butler for Ariza and tried playing Bledsoe at the 2. Spacing would not be that good but that defense!

A very good wing defender in Ariza + a defensive maniac in Bledsoe. *drools*

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418600by Agent0 » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:28 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

I still wanted to try that Bledsoe at SG thing, just very reminiscent of Avery Bradley with Boston, except a more talented offensive player.

That Ariza trade should have been made

                
      Back to top
CP3Heliflopter
Post ID: 418609by CP3Heliflopter » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:34 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
 Avatar

Posts: 5572
Reputation: 168.4Reputation: 168.4 Rep Post +1
votes: 10

Bledsoe would be undersized for a SG but he has a great wingspan + he is very athletic. Our offense would take a hit for sure but I guarantee we would be a top 10 defensive team at the very least with those two guys assuming Mullens doesn't play. If we have a defensive backup big like Odom we could arguably be a top 5 defensive team.

Nevertheless, Bledsoe would have gotten traded at some point since he would get a big pay day but we could have gotten more for him if we traded Butler for Ariza. Maybe Redick + another nice asset. Lots of possibilities. If we had to trade him I would want a talented two way 3 and D player like Kawhi Leonard.

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post ID: 418620by tense2 » Dec 04, 2013 - 09:53 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8137
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Some of us wanted to try that experiment with Bled at the 2, but most people here were against that. Oh well.

                
      Back to top
Voyeur
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418625by Voyeur » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:04 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 5129
Rep Post +1
votes: 29

Our shooting would be terrible with Bledsoe at the 2. And certainly wouldn't work for the kind of offense Doc had in mind. Gotta love Bledsoe's energy and defense though.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418631by Agent0 » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:20 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

^Maybe not terrible, spacing would not be as good, true, but the offense would still be able to be effective. Just have to balance it. Get a high volume, high percentage 3PT shooter at the 3, eg: Dorell Wright type guy.

I guess we should refer to it more as Gentry's offense, but Doc's offense in Boston did have Avery Bradley, but I'm not going to say the offense was good, but Rondo is nowhere near the offensive player CP is, and neither is old KG any where near as effective on offense as Blake.

You also don't need a backup PG. You stagger the minutes so one of Paul or Bledsoe is always on the court, and you have a 3rd PG capable guy just in case of injury.

That was probably the most painful part for me, cause Paul and Bledsoe together on the court was a very interesting combination.

I know Dudley is the big talk, but the Bledsoe to Collison switch was supposed to be defense for offense. Sadly, so far, Collison is of course nowhere near defensively, we knew that, but also worse offensively than Bledsoe last season.

So there are most issues than one right now, but Collison is playing his worst basketball in a couple of seasons, so it's a bit weird on that front too.

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post ID: 418632by tense2 » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:20 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8137
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Who knows for sure, but his FG% of .490 so far this year wouldn't have been too bad, lol. Plus he gets to the FT line and rebounds at an above average rate for the SG position....and the defense. Hmmm.

                
      Back to top
Agent0
Post ID: 418633by Agent0 » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:26 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 3132
Reputation: 125.2 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

I wasn't too against paying him either, but with some roster changes. Bledsoe could have been a Ginobili, Harden, etc, but a PG/SG.

My idea was pay him the money, move Crawford, plug in a role player 3/D SG type, or get a SG/SF to start at the 2, so you can move them. Bledsoe then plays about 32 MPG off the bench. 12 MPG as backup PG and then another 20 MPG at SG. The starting SG plays 28 MPG at SG, then if he's a player you want to play more, another 6-8 MPG at SF.

...that was me, but people have different thoughts. Maybe you do a pre-emptive extension at $8-9M/year, and it would work out, especially since you are saving on backup PG money.

Multiple position players off the bench are usually very valuable because of that, and it is the one thing I haven't loved about the players on the bench, they have been single position guys for the most part.

With Ariza, think a roster like:

Paul / Bledsoe 3/D SG / Bledsoe Ariza / some guy

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 418637by clipper*joe » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:45 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14818
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Which was our biggest hole last season. Can't blame the FO for going in that direction.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 418638by clipper*joe » Dec 04, 2013 - 10:47 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14818
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

How much of that was actually "shooting"?

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post ID: 418641by tense2 » Dec 05, 2013 - 12:08 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8137
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Don't know, but 49% are going in the hole and I like those results.

                
      Back to top
Clipperfn4lf
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418655by Clipperfn4lf » Dec 05, 2013 - 02:05 AM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1272
Rep Post +1
votes: 9

Dudley pretty much sucks at everything besides a corner three. It honestly hurts to watch him play basketball. Martell Webster would be the perfect player at the 3 position IMO.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418678by jarca » Dec 05, 2013 - 11:17 AM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7373

rp.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

Monopoly folks probably think Dudley had a "good game" last night

                
      Back to top
DocHollywood
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418683by DocHollywood » Dec 05, 2013 - 12:22 PM PST
Posts: 327
Location: Honolulu
Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Dudley had a spectacular game last night....

                
      Back to top
austin009009
Post Subject: RE: Jared Dudley Performance Discussion Thread Post ID: 418698by austin009009 » Dec 05, 2013 - 03:03 PM PST
Clipper Starter
 Avatar

Posts: 280
Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7Reputation: 17.7 Rep Post +1
votes: 0

dudley really is very sluggish

                
      Back to top
Go To the Top of the ThreadGo Home

or Comment Using FB

Post new topic   Reply to topic
← JJ Redick Is Special For Us Log in to check your private messages → Free Agents Ideas/News for Clippers


← JJ Redick Is Special For Us

→ Free Agents Ideas/News for Clippers

Related Topics
Topic Replies Posted
No new posts Clippers Betting Odds Discussion & Analysis 0 Apr 18, 2014 - 12:26 PM
No new posts Clippers vs Warriors Playoffs Game Thread 2014-04-19 76 Apr 17, 2014 - 01:21 AM
No new posts Clippers @ Trailblazers Game Thread 2014-04-16 241 Apr 16, 2014 - 03:08 AM
No new posts Clippers vs Nuggets Game Thread 2014-04-15 109 Apr 15, 2014 - 12:27 AM
No new posts Clippers vs. Kings Game Thread 2014-04-12 74 Apr 12, 2014 - 10:29 AM


register
You are an anonymous user- Register now!


Follow our Los Angeles Clippers RSS Feed, plus the Clippers Rumors RSS Feed, the LA Clippers News RSS feed, and the Clippers Forum RSS feed to get the newest updated Clippers News and Trade Rumors plus Clippers Game update in your RSS/XML reader!