Clippers Topbuzz
Post new topic   Reply to topic
← Never Forgetting Brand, Cassel and the 2005-2006 Clippers Log in to check your private messages → Clippers Sign Darius Morris
Author   
FightOnRon
Post Subject: INSIDER: No Chris Paul, No Playoffs? Post ID: 426650by FightOnRon » Jan 04, 2014 - 08:16 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
 Avatar

Posts: 4255
Location: The Darkside
us.gif

Reputation: 305.5Reputation: 305.5 Rep Post +1
votes: 35
 

Losing their star PG could douse Clips' postseason chances in loaded West

(Don't shoot the messenger!)

The mildly disappointing season of the Los Angeles Clippers hit another road bump Friday when MVP candidate Chris Paul went down with a separated right shoulder. The timetable for Paul's return is three to five weeks, though Clippers coach Doc Rivers conceded that his star's recovery could take even longer.

After replacing Vinny Del Negro on the sidelines with Rivers during the offseason, and adding key role players Darren Collison, Jared Dudley and J.J. Redick, the Clippers entered this season as a popular choice to win the Western Conference. With Paul exploding out of the gate, the Clippers looked like an offensive juggernaut in the early going. However, the loss of Redick to a broken wrist stemmed the tide a bit, and the Clippers have struggled with consistency. Los Angeles is just .500 on the road and tied in the loss column with upstart Phoenix on top of the Pacific Division. With most of the Western Conference playoff contenders so clustered, the loss of Paul threatens to throw some serious obstacles in the Clippers' eventual playoff path.

In reality, as we near the halfway point of the season, the Clippers have taken a minor step back from 2012-13, the most successful campaign in the lackluster history of the franchise. Los Angeles' .657 winning percentage is off from last season's .683, and its point differential is nearly a point per game worse. These setbacks aside, the Clippers remained in the title chase before Paul's injury, garnering an 8.3 percent chance to win it all per the most recent Hollinger Playoff Odds report. In the big picture, what has changed?

Paul's shot at MVP

For Paul, the loss of five weeks hinders his MVP case in a season with several strong candidates. Through Friday, Paul ranked third in the league in WARP (8.6), just behind Kevin Durant (8.8) and Kevin Love (8.6). LeBron James lurks just behind (8.3) and you figure he's due for one of his uber-streaks of otherworldly play. Stephen Curry and Paul George might also worm their way into the mix.

Paul was in the hunt for the MVP, which seems secondary now. Assuming Paul returns in the quoted time frame, it's likely he'll slip behind the players mentioned. However, if the Clippers struggle while he's out, then go on a streak when he returns, it could have the ironic effect of enhancing Paul's MVP campaign.

That's the least of Paul's worries today. It's troublesome that the separation occurred in Paul's shooting shoulder. We can only speculate what sort of lingering effects the injury will have on one of the league's most efficient shooters, and there isn't a lot of recent history to look at, as it's not a terribly common injury type in basketball, at least according to my injury data. The upshot is that since it's an upper-body injury, presumably Paul will be able to maintain his conditioning. Assuming that the issue is fully resolved by the time Paul is cleared to return to action, he will hopefully be able to hit the ground running.

Playoffs?

The Clippers went 6-6 with Paul out last season, but had one of this season's breakout players -- Eric Bledsoe, ironically, now with the Suns -- waiting in reserve. Last season, Bledsoe struggled somewhat in the larger role, averaging 14.2 points, 5.3 assists and shooting 40.5 percent in Paul's absence. This season, the Clippers have Collison around to take over, who is a pretty nice fallback option. Collison emerged as a sought-after NBA point guard back in 2009-10, when he filled in for an injured Paul for New Orleans.

That season, Collison put up 18.8 points and 9.1 assists during the 37 games he started for Paul while averaging more than 40 minutes per game. He is likely looking at a similar workload this time around. The big difference is that Collison has played off the ball a lot of time this season, which won't be the case with Paul out. Collison should be able to take over some of Paul's scoring load, as his true shooting percentage (.565) is in the same neighborhood as Paul's (.578). However, the gap will likely grow as Collison uses a larger portion of the Clippers' possessions.

Without Paul, the Clippers will have to lean heavily on Griffin. More crucial will be how well Collison replaces Paul's role as playmaker and his league-best assist rate. Collison's history as a decision-maker is spotty, and turnovers often have limited his playability. The Clippers have the sixth-lowest turnover rate in the league, and since they don't hit the offensive glass particularly hard, they can't really afford a spike in miscues. If Rivers tries to compensate by sending Blake Griffin to the glass more often, that could hinder the Clippers defensively against some of the West's better running teams.

While Collison will be under the proverbial microscope, it's Griffin who will have to step up. Griffin has been playing his best basketball of the season in recent games, but now he's going to have to dance to a new tune, so to speak, without the maestro Paul around to attract defenders and set Griffin up on the pick-and-roll.

According to the on/off-court database at nbawowy.com, Griffin has a 28.3 percent usage rate and a .559 true shooting percentage this season when sharing the floor with Paul, but no Collison. When he's playing with Collison and not Paul, Griffin has a 24.7 percent usage rate and a .573 true shooting percentage. The usage drops a little because of the presence of Jamal Crawford in many of those Collison-but-no-Paul lineups, but the increase in efficiency is a great sign, for both Griffin and the Clippers.

Paul is one of the league's top clutch players, and ranks fifth in scoring this season during the last five minutes of games that are within five points or fewer. However, Griffin and Crawford also have taken a lot of shots in those situations and have both shot a better percentage than Paul. Of course, much of that is due to Paul's decision-making at the point in end-game situations. It's likely that when he needs a big basket, Rivers will now run a lot of two-man basketball with Crawford and Griffin. He should have Redick back soon, and in him, Matt Barnes and Dudley, the Clippers have plenty of veteran spot-up shooters to take big shots. Paul is as good as it gets in the clutch, but the Clippers have more than enough to work with for a short stretch.

Losing Paul throws a wrench into the works, but this is just the kind of adversity a title team overcomes. If the Clippers collapse in the interim, they were never a bona fide championship contender to begin with. If Paul misses five weeks, that would put him back in action after the All-Star break. He'd miss 20 games by that point, 10 at home and 10 on the road, and 13 of those games are against the Eastern Conference. In other words, it's not the most brutal stretch of schedule an NBA team could have. Given that the Clippers have outscored opponents by 3.4 points per 100 possessions with Paul off the floor, you can easily envision Rivers escaping with something like a 12-8 mark during his star's absence, perhaps better.

That would leave the Clippers 31-20 with a recovered and rested Paul for the stretch run. L.A. might well sink to No. 6 or No. 7 in the West by then, but it's unlikely they'll fall far off the logjam of teams that reside on its tier. With more than one-third of the campaign to go when Paul returns, the Clippers will have ample opportunity to make a run at a home playoff seed.

In other words, all things are still on the table for Rivers and his club. Losing Paul throws a wrench into the works, but this is just the kind of adversity a title team overcomes. If the Clippers collapse in the interim, they were never a bona fide championship contender to begin with.



                
      Back to top
FightOnRon
Post Subject: RE: INSIDER: No Chris Paul, No Playoffs? Post ID: 426651by FightOnRon » Jan 04, 2014 - 08:17 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 4255
Location: The Darkside
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

linky: http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10243716/nba-does-chris-paul -injury-sink-los-angeles-clippers-season

                
      Back to top
Laak
Post Subject: RE: INSIDER: No Chris Paul, No Playoffs? Post ID: 426661by Laak » Jan 04, 2014 - 08:25 PM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 375
Rep Post +1
votes: 1

" If the Clippers collapse in the interim, they were never a bona fide championship contender to begin with."

Agree with this 100%.

                
      Back to top
clipper321
Post Subject: RE: INSIDER: No Chris Paul, No Playoffs? Post ID: 426801by clipper321 » Jan 04, 2014 - 10:03 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1373
Location: California
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 10

Considering how deep the west is its possible if Cp3 goes down for the season. Right now, however, its just speculation until we have a larger sample size or games.

                
      Back to top
D_AndreBBeater
Post ID: 426842by D_AndreBBeater » Jan 04, 2014 - 11:57 PM PST
Posts: 4
Rep Post +1
votes: 0

The West is real tough. I don't know if we'll get Home court for sure, for sure

                
      Back to top
Amnesty_David_Stern
Post ID: 426859by Amnesty_David_Stern » Jan 05, 2014 - 02:49 AM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 2331
Rep Post +1
votes: 7

CP3 or not for 3-5 weeks, we still hit the playoffs. Granted, home court may not happen we'd get the chance to knock out a top shelf team right away. I like our chances against Portland a lot.

                
      Back to top
Laak
Post ID: 426865by Laak » Jan 05, 2014 - 10:11 AM PST
Clipper Starter
Posts: 375
Rep Post +1
votes: 1

As terrible as we were last night, I like our chances against Spurs too. Only teams I fear playing against are OKC and GS.

                
      Back to top
slestack11
Post Subject: RE: INSIDER: No Chris Paul, No Playoffs? Post ID: 427047by slestack11 » Jan 06, 2014 - 01:19 AM PST
Clipper Starter
 Avatar

Posts: 909
Reputation: 105 Rep Post +1
votes: 6

I think the loss to the Spurs was more about the Spurs than the Clippers. The Spurs were coming off an embarrassing loss to the Knicks and the Clippers were coming off a back-to-back from a late Dallas win. Losing to Orlando tomorrow night would be more telling as far as the state of the Clippers. We do get JJ Redick back in a week or so. This would allow Crawford to play the point and solidify the 2nd unit again.

                
      Back to top
Go To the Top of the ThreadGo Home

or Comment Using FB

Post new topic   Reply to topic
← Never Forgetting Brand, Cassel and the 2005-2006 Clippers Log in to check your private messages → Clippers Sign Darius Morris


← Never Forgetting Brand, Cassel and the 2005-2006 Clippers

→ Clippers Sign Darius Morris

Related Topics
Topic Replies Posted
No new posts Blake Griffin and Chris Paul Become Equals for Clippers 12 Apr 22, 2014 - 11:12 PM
No new posts Clippers vs Warriors Playoffs Gm. #2 Game Thread 2014-04-21 843 Apr 20, 2014 - 06:37 PM
No new posts Clippers vs Warriors Playoffs Gm. #1 Game Thread 2014-04-19 1059 Apr 17, 2014 - 01:21 AM
No new posts Andrew Bogut out with Broken Rib. May Miss Entire Playoffs 3 Apr 15, 2014 - 05:35 PM
No new posts Chris Paul Boo'ed Again at Dodger Game 21 Apr 04, 2014 - 09:19 PM


register
You are an anonymous user- Register now!


Follow our Los Angeles Clippers RSS Feed, plus the Clippers Rumors RSS Feed, the LA Clippers News RSS feed, and the Clippers Forum RSS feed to get the newest updated Clippers News and Trade Rumors plus Clippers Game update in your RSS/XML reader!