| Author |
Message |
toohipcliptoslip
|
|
Post subject: Q Ross
 Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 12:41 AM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Posts: 655
  
votes: 6
Status: Offline
|
|
| With Corey gone, we're thin at SF. How's about this? We give Q a nice one year contract $1.5 maybe even $2 (Sorry but we can't sign Shaun at all because even a mill could be better spent). He was in a slump last yr OR his good play in the past was a fluke. If he shows some offense, he's more marketable on the FA list nxt yr and he gets a good paycheck this yr. If he fizzles, we aren't stuck with his contract A gamble. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
david
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 12:44 AM PST
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 13, 2001
Posts: 2282
Location: Austin, TX
votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| ^^I definitely agree toohip. I think Q was looking for more $ than that though. I'm sure that the Clippers wouldn't have qualms about giving him $1.5. I hope he will change his mind! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
bballanalyst
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 12:47 AM PST
|
|
Clipper D-League Pickup
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Posts: 44
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| It would be good to sign both Q Ross and Livingston for the minimum. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
erupt107th
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 02:48 AM PST
|
|
Clipper D-League Pickup
Joined: Jul 03, 2008 Age: 19
Posts: 32
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
I used to really like Q but last season he was a real liability on offense.
I would still like to re-sign him and maybe he can be a better player off the bench. |
_________________
She dig my fashion, I'm a fool with the style.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Miquel
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 04:00 AM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jan 28, 2002
Posts: 727
Location: Barcelona
votes: 10
Status: Offline
|
|
| I see Q more a SG than a SF and I think our main lack is the SF position where we only have Marcus Williams who is a totally unproven player. I don't know how many millions we still can spend but the SF is the position we should upgrade. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jlemmen43
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 - 03:56 PM PST
|
|
Clipper All-Star
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
Posts: 1324
Location: Green Bay, WI
votes: 10
Status: Offline
|
|
|
erupt107th wrote:
I used to really like Q but last season he was a real liability on offense.
I would still like to re-sign him and maybe he can be a better player off the bench.
Yeah, he wont have to be any kind of offensive hero this year if he'd re-sign. We have plenty of scoring options now, Ross can just play defense off the bench. |
_________________
Favorite Teams:
(NBA) Clippers_(NFL) Jaguars_(NCAA) PITT_(MLB) Marlins_(NHL) Canucks
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
EG#23
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Q Ross
Posted: Jul 04, 2008 - 03:25 AM PST
|
|
Clipper D-League Pickup
Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Posts: 11
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| I just don't get all this love for Q (the offensive liability) Ross or Brevin the (don't take any risk assist) Knight. For all the great defense we had the worst back court on offense in all of the association. He doesn't rebound he's not in the top ten in steals he can't shoot on open shot by himself on the court. I don't see any threads of teams drooling to have him. In most games he started we were behind in the 1st quater by ten points or more with our second squad having to even the score in the second quater. So i just don't get the defensive side point of view. We should have Cutino starting I feel you always put your best squad period on the floor to start the game. I rather be up by ten and lose a lead than having to trail by ten the entire season......Another point if anybody paid attention to all the laker series they would see that CAT was our mvp he always seams to find his best when he plays kobe and the lakers even phil has acknowledged this yet Dumleavy insist on his great defensive stopper getting most of our 2 guard minutes. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
