| Author |
Message |
2pac
|
|
Post subject: Zach randolph
 Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 05:41 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Rookie
Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 65
  
Status: Offline
|
|
| i had a big felling the clippers were goin to try to trade more this guy he is a 20 10 guy and i dont know why no one talks about him i think he is beeter than the goeat elton brand have u seen elton when he chews on gum he opens all of his mouth like a goeat |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
jarca
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 05:44 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Posts: 253
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| i like randolph... he hustles for offensive rebound and has a nice mid-range. if we could get him for expiring contract like mobley, then i say go for it. this will give us more money for a proven shooting guard. i heard michael redd is on the block? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2pac
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 05:47 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Rookie
Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 65
Status: Offline
|
|
| both of them i wish we could get both then we will have a champion chip contender than just playoof contender |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jarca
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 05:51 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Posts: 253
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| we should trade mobley for randolph. sign okafor for as much money he wants then trade him to michael redd of milwaukee. the bucks need a low post present since they lost yi. this makes sense since there were rumor that redd was no longer wanted in the bucks |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2pac
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:01 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Rookie
Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 65
Status: Offline
|
|
| i dont think the knicks would trade him for just mobley he has alot of salary cap |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
corgiBear8
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:01 PM PST
|
|
Clipper 6th Man
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
Posts: 105
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| I am not a fan of Zach. I think he is all O and no D. He lacks heart and brains. He only hustles for donuts. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ether
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:02 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: 577
Location: Los Angeles
votes: 9
Status: Offline
|
|
Personally I don't like Randolph, he is not a stand-up guy Clipper fans normally like.
That being said, there's no one who's more of a beast under the basket! His game is similar to what EB's was years ago (scoring most of his points on put-backs). With him and Kaman, the paint would be one dangerous area! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jarca
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Zach randolph
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:03 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Posts: 253
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
|
2pac wrote:
i dont think the knicks would trade him for just mobley he has alot of salary cap
but mobley's contract expires at the right time. the same time lebron's contract expires  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jarca
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:05 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Posts: 253
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
|
ether wrote:
Personally I don't like Randolph, he is not a stand-up guy Clipper fans normally like.
That being said, there's no one who's more of a beast under the basket! His game is similar to what EB's was years ago (scoring most of his points on put-backs). With him and Kaman, the paint would be one dangerous area!
dunleavy was the coach in portland who gave randolph the opportunity to prove himself |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2pac
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:07 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Rookie
Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 65
Status: Offline
|
|
| i hope they trade for him |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:31 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jun 04, 2008
Posts: 492
Location: Los Angeles
votes: 8
|
|
Zach Rondolph: NO. NO. A THOUSAND TIME NO.
We just got jipped by the seemingly nicest guy in the league. I don't want to bring in this grossly overpaid knucklehead, even if he does get 20-10. |
_________________
Knock on wood!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clipnasty
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 06:42 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Jul 18, 2007 Age: 24
Posts: 625
votes: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yeah im gonna pass on Big Randolph |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
toohipcliptoslip
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 11:05 PM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Posts: 650
votes: 6
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yeah he is a knucklehead but as we found, you can never count on a "stand up guy" If he produces and his idiocy doesn't cause problems go for him |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CHUCKZILLA
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 09, 2008 - 11:13 PM PST
|
|
Clipper D-League Pickup
Joined: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 13
Location: SO CAL
Status: Offline
|
|
| we talking about Zach Randolph, why???? not the type of player (attitude) i'd want in the locker room. yeah he may be a 20-10 guy but i'd choose Josh Smith over this character in a heartbeat..but if we can give up Mobley for him, why not?.. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Bustamonte
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:05 AM PST
|
|
Clipper D-League Pickup
Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
|
| realize we would need to give Mobley and Thomas to make the trade work. After that we would have 5 (6) active players to contract. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
david
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:29 AM PST
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 13, 2001
Posts: 2277
Location: Austin, TX
votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| I would have to pass trading for Randolph for now. Why trade away one of our core players when we have the possibility to sign a big time talent without giving up anyone? It could make sense later on as an alternative if we couldn't get our main guys. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clippers0918
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:36 AM PST
|
|
Clipper 6th Man
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 164
Status: Offline
|
|
if we get zack we cn use our money to go after people like iggy and red that is why.
it basically becomes mobely/tim and oak/josh
or
iggy or red and zack
i like #2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
david
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:43 AM PST
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 13, 2001
Posts: 2277
Location: Austin, TX
votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| ^^Only thing though is that the Knicks are trying to get rid of salary- they wold be taking on two sizable contracts in Mobley/Thomas. Plus if we lose Mobley we'd be really short on the 2-guard front. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
frankiefkmor
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:45 AM PST
|
|
Clipper 6th Man
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Posts: 164
Location: LA
votes: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
| Guys we cant lose players. We need a team!!! Mobley and Thomas will do fine with a real PG. We need to keep them, they are needed and will fill in just fine. I know Thomas is lazy and weak on D but Baron will make them better and bring some excitement to the TEAM! He is a leader!! |
_________________
Taylor Hooks..."Will You MARRY ME?!!!"
LA'S #1 Team...THE CLIPPERS!!!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clippers0918
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 12:54 AM PST
|
|
Clipper 6th Man
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 164
Status: Offline
|
|
well both of their contracts end in 2009 or something so knicks have space.
and adding iggy or red would make us lights out.
but that being said i think #1 is more likely.
mobley is needed to play d at sg against kobe/wade and others(gordon will be there but not yet)
tim if healthy and baron spreads the floor with bigs under the basket(kaman/okafor) he will be deadly in 3land. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clipps04
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 - 01:02 AM PST
|
|
Clipper Starter
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Age: 20
Posts: 963
votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yeah we really do need a bench. Do we only have like 6 players signed officially? lol |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
