Clippers Topbuzz
Main Menu
· Home
· Clippers Forum
· Clipper Blog
· User Settings
· Submit News
· Contact Us
· Spread the Word
· Clipper Pictures
· Clippers Schedule
· Most Requested
· Site Rules/Guidelines


Game Today
No Game Today.
Next Game
Wednesday Oct 29 7:30PM
vs. Los Angeles Lakers
TV: ESPN
Following Game
Friday Oct 31 7:30PM
vs. Denver Nuggets

Clippers Standings
23-59, Fifth, Pacific


Latest Comments
· by ether in Who will start at S... on Aug 14, 2008 - 03:46 PM
· by Jay.r in Who will start at S... on Aug 14, 2008 - 01:34 PM
· by clipnasty in Warriors Match- Kel... on Jul 24, 2008 - 01:16 PM
· by frankiefkmor in If Mo Evans signed ... on Jul 23, 2008 - 12:34 PM
· by clipnasty in Who will be our lea... on Jul 22, 2008 - 01:31 AM


Current Clipper Roster
  • Clipper Team Photos
  • Baron Davis
  • Marcus Camby
  • Al Thornton
  • Cuttino Mobley
  • Ricky Davis
  • Eric Gordon
  • Shaun Livingston
  • Chris Kaman
  • Quinton Ross
  • Jason Hart
  • Tim Thomas
  • DeAndre Jordan
  • Mike Taylor
  • Paul Davis
  • Josh Powell
  • Nick Fazekas
  • Marcus Williams
  • Coach: Mike Dunleavy
  • GM: Elgin Baylor
  • Broadcaster: Ralph Lawler
  • Mike Smith
  • Clipper Spirit Dance Team
  • Donald Sterling (Owner)
  • Clipper Nation (fans)

  • Clippers Topbuzz RSS
    Add the Clippers Topbuzz RSS file to your favorite RSS news reader.

    Topbuzz Sports Network
    If you're also a Laker fan (or want to flame the Clippers vs. Lakers debate) be sure to check out the Lakers Topbuzz for the latest Los Angeles Lakers News & Rumors + fan discussions.

    Like-wise if you're a Portland Trailblazers fan or simply intrigued and want to talk about their #1 overall pick in the 2007 NBA Draft, visit the brand spankin' new Blazers Topbuzz!

    Visit the brand new Los Angeles Dodgers Topbuzz- Go Blue!


      

    Clippers TopBuzz Forum Index

    Post new topic   Reply to topic
    View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
    Author Message
    mashian3Offline
    Post subject: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBuzz?  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:40 AM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 71

    Reputation: 13.7
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    I am reading mixed reviews on this trade and I don't understand why.

    Marcus Camby and Baron Davis are a much better duo than Maggette & Brand. Does anyone understand that having a solid PG like Baron Davis is such a huge upgrade than we had last year. And yeah, so what if we lost Brand....A duo of Kaman and Camby will be the best defensive front court in the NBA. I love this move. Camby not only plays defense, but he also rebounds, he can shoot the ball, and he can dunk on the opposite end of an alley-oop.

    I love this move and think Kaman/Camby will be the new twin towers. We just need a nice shooter for some depth. I like our squad right now.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    MiquelOffline
    Post subject: RE: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBuzz?  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:53 AM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Jan 28, 2002
    Posts: 705
    Location: Barcelona
    sp.gif

    Reputation: 119.1
    votes: 10
    Status: Offline
    Yes. I like the trade too. I think Kaman and Marcus can play together.

    The next goal is upgrade our bench. The Thornton's backup should be the main target because I can't see any player who could come off the bench for the SF position.

    Marcus Williams is only showing in this summerleague that we can't rely on him.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    mashian3Offline
    Post subject: RE: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBuzz?  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:57 AM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 71

    Reputation: 13.7
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    How does our roster look right now?

    PG: Davis/Knight
    SG: Mobley/Gordon
    SF: Thornton/Thomas
    PF: Camby/Powell
    C: Kaman/Jordan

    Can't Tim Thomas come off the bench for Thornton? I really think that his 3PT% is going to sky rocket with Davis running the point. Powell can back up Camby at PF, Jordan for Kaman. I think they need to re-sign Q Ross for defensive purposes, get a 3rd PG for real cheap, and a decent 3pt shooter.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    mashian3Offline
    Post subject: RE: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBuzz?  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:59 AM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 71

    Reputation: 13.7
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    They also have Mike Taylor...so that can be their 3rd PG. So I think resigning Q Ross and picking up a 3pt shooter is a must.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    MiquelOffline
    Post subject: Re: RE: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBu  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 06:02 AM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Jan 28, 2002
    Posts: 705
    Location: Barcelona
    sp.gif

    Reputation: 119.1
    votes: 10
    Status: Offline
    mashian3 wrote:
    They also have Mike Taylor...so that can be their 3rd PG. So I think resigning Q Ross and picking up a 3pt shooter is a must.


    Q isn't a SF. I insist that we haven't got any backup for Thornton. This is reallly a must.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    mashian3Offline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 06:06 AM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 71

    Reputation: 13.7
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    I wasn't implying that Q would be a SF. I was saying Tim Thomas would be a good fit as SF in a Baron Davis type offense
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    toohipcliptoslipOffline
    Post subject:   PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 07:37 AM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 586

    Reputation: 74.6
    votes: 6
    Status: Offline
    Q could play SF but I would rather if he had to. Didn't he when Corey was out? But our bench is offensively challenged and we don't need another non-scorer. We can get scorers for near the same $$ Gomes had been touted widely here
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    toohipcliptoslipOffline
    Post subject:   PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 07:40 AM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 586

    Reputation: 74.6
    votes: 6
    Status: Offline
    change that to Q can play SF if he had to but I'd rather not have him
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    noname24Offline
    Post subject: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBuzz?  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:27 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jul 02, 2008
    Posts: 76

    Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3
    Status: Offline
    mashian3 wrote:
    I am reading mixed reviews on this trade and I don't understand why.

    Marcus Camby and Baron Davis are a much better duo than Maggette & Brand. Does anyone understand that having a solid PG like Baron Davis is such a huge upgrade than we had last year. And yeah, so what if we lost Brand....A duo of Kaman and Camby will be the best defensive front court in the NBA. I love this move. Camby not only plays defense, but he also rebounds, he can shoot the ball, and he can dunk on the opposite end of an alley-oop.

    I love this move and think Kaman/Camby will be the new twin towers. We just need a nice shooter for some depth. I like our squad right now.


    New twin towers? Lol. Sorry I think there's a Bynum-Gasol tower in the other locker room that will dominate next year...
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    Clipper_FaNOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBu  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:31 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jun 20, 2008
    Posts: 93
    Location: Bell, CA
    Reputation: 10
    Status: Offline
    Come on Gasol-Bynum???????
    With all of respect. i love Pau Gasol BUT he didnt show nothing in the FINALS!!!!!!
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    ClipperCalvinOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBu  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:32 PM PST
    Clipper 6th Man


    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 211

    Reputation: 22.4Reputation: 22.4
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    yea, their twin towers is better, but not by much...kaman is better defense than gasol...but yea, we need another RFA to solidify the team...if we can snatch Vujacic away from the lakers, then it would help a ton in terms of balancing our team vs. theirs....
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    loganhunterOffline
    14 Post subject: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:32 PM PST
    Clipper D-League Pickup


    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 10

    Reputation: 1.6
    Status: Offline
    Clipper_FaN wrote:
    Come on Gasol-Bynum???????
    With all of respect. i love Pau Gasol BUT he didnt show nothing in the FINALS!!!!!!


    Couldn't agree with you more.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    Clipper_FaNOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on TopBu  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:32 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jun 20, 2008
    Posts: 93
    Location: Bell, CA
    Reputation: 10
    Status: Offline
    and also everyone is saying that the Blazers, Lakers and Hornets are gonna be contenders nex year
    Trust me one of those teams wont be even in the top 4
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    noname24Offline
    Post subject: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:32 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jul 02, 2008
    Posts: 76

    Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3Reputation: 8.3
    Status: Offline
    Clipper_FaN wrote:
    Come on Gasol-Bynum???????
    With all of respect. i love Pau Gasol BUT he didnt show nothing in the FINALS!!!!!!


    It was his first finals appearance. He was playing out of position (his natural position is PF). He couldn't take the shots that he took. GARNETT, the defensive player of the year, was guarding him. If Bynum was there, Gasol would be able to go back to his 15 foot shots instead of trying to man up downlow with the toughest centers, something that he isn't.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    Clipper_FaNOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 01:39 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jun 20, 2008
    Posts: 93
    Location: Bell, CA
    Reputation: 10
    Status: Offline
    In better words he was intimidated by KG!
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    etherOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 02:05 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Feb 23, 2007
    Posts: 536
    Location: Los Angeles
    Reputation: 71.1
    votes: 8
    Status: Offline
    This is simple:

    Kaman > Bynum (the kid has yet to put two good months together)
    Camby = Gasol. This is generous to Gasol. Pau better O, but Camby better D by a mile. Playing head to head, Camby will negate Gasol and get more boards.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    ClipperCalvinOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 02:07 PM PST
    Clipper 6th Man


    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 211

    Reputation: 22.4Reputation: 22.4
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    i would think more along:

    Kaman = Bynum....and Gasol > Camby....but we very close....
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    clipperfan909Offline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 02:52 PM PST
    Clipper 6th Man


    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 218

    Reputation: 29.9Reputation: 29.9Reputation: 29.9
    votes: 9
    Status: Offline
    Kaman>Bynum!

    Gasol>Camby!
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    etherOffline
    Post subject:   PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 03:52 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Feb 23, 2007
    Posts: 536
    Location: Los Angeles
    Reputation: 71.1
    votes: 8
    Status: Offline
    According to the Rocky Mountain News website, 82% of the fans don't like the trade. That's a good sign for us.

    Most of their posts say "Camby was a pillar or the community" or "Would rather have dumped K-Mart or Nene". A few even would rather have seen Melo traded!

    They liked Camby, so I think we will as well.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    MrBOffline
    Post subject:   PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 04:12 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Jun 06, 2008 Age: 32

    Posts: 340

    Reputation: 32.9Reputation: 32.9Reputation: 32.9
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline
    I think alot of people here wanted J. Smith instead of Camby and may have had a bit of a let down in acquiring Camby instead. Camby, when healthy is definitely a force when it comes to rebounding and defense. If he and Kaman can both stay healthy for the major part of the year we will outrebound just about anybody. With J. Smith in the lineup that probably wouldn't have been the case. The 3 point looks will definitely open up with the front court tandem we now have. Thomas, Mobley, Davis, Gordon will all get open looks at 3's in Dunleavy's system. We probably could use one more shooter but with only 2 mil left under the cap its gonna have to be either a really young or old player thats willing to take the minimum salary.

    I also think our front court is better then the Lakers. Let me tell you why. Bynum is younger and has less experience while Gasol who has shown he can be (really)soft at times. Bynum has to comeback from his injury. It's unknown how this will effect his confidence. He had just started playing well and now he has to start over so to speak. Kaman and Camby are both somewhat established at this point. Can't say the same for Bynum and the Lakers. The only thing that makes the Lakers better then the Clippers is they have Kobe.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    slestack11Offline
    Post subject: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 04:36 PM PST
    Clipper Rookie


    Joined: Jun 23, 2008
    Posts: 87

    Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2Reputation: 8.2
    votes: 7
    Status: Offline
    Clipper_FaN wrote:
    Come on Gasol-Bynum???????
    With all of respect. i love Pau Gasol BUT he didnt show nothing in the FINALS!!!!!!


    Don't mean to be a hater here, but at least Gasol was IN the Finals which is more that you can say for Kaman or Camby. You can't really gain experience unless you get experience.

    That said, I do like the acquisition of Camby because that seemed to be the only option outside of Zach Randolph. I'd much rather have Camby over Randolph because of his defense and lack of years on his contract. This also gives the Clippers cap space in the precious 2010 off-season. Whether having Baron and Camby is better than Brand and Maggette is moot. The latter were leaving anyway so I'd say the Clips are fortunate to get guys like Baron Davis and Marcus Camby to pick up the next two seasons.

    I also feel like Mobley and Tim Thomas are due for career years as they have expiring contracts. If ever they would be motivate, it would be this season.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    clipps04Offline
    Post subject: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 04:55 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Age: 20

    Posts: 957

    us.gif

    Reputation: 106.1
    votes: 8
    Status: Offline
    slestack11 wrote:
    Don't mean to be a hater here, but at least Gasol was IN the Finals which is more that you can say for Kaman or Camby. You can't really gain experience unless you get experience.

    Camby has 60 playoff games under his belt.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    journeyman
    Post subject: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here on T  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:17 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Jun 04, 2008
    Posts: 456
    Location: Los Angeles
    um.gif

    Reputation: 46.8Reputation: 46.8Reputation: 46.8Reputation: 46.8Reputation: 46.8
    votes: 8
    clipps04 wrote:
    slestack11 wrote:
    Don't mean to be a hater here, but at least Gasol was IN the Finals which is more that you can say for Kaman or Camby. You can't really gain experience unless you get experience.

    Camby has 60 playoff games under his belt.


    And Gasol was 0-12 in the post-season with the Grizzlies. Kaman is 7-5 in his post-season appearences.
     
     View user's profile Send private message  
    Reply with quote Back to top
    MrBOffline
    Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is this trade getting mixed review here  PostPosted: Jul 16, 2008 - 05:29 PM PST
    Clipper Starter


    Joined: Jun 06, 2008 Age: 32

    Posts: 340

    Reputation: 32.9Reputation: 32.9Reputation: 32.9
    votes: 2
    Status: Offline