Clippers Topbuzz
Post new topic   Reply to topic
← John Ireland interviews Blake about contract extension Log in to check your private messages → Remaining Free Agents
Author   
PleaseSellDTS
Post Subject: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297697by PleaseSellDTS » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:52 AM PST
Posts: 236
Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7 Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Not even debatable a few years back but now????

The Buss kids dont seem to have the same win at any cost mentality, and sometimes make moves for luxury tax reasons. Jerry B, with rare exception, made a move if he could do it under the salary cap, notwithstanding the $ implications.

Now, DTS appears to be spending $ ... dare I say it ... wisely. While the Buss kids try to appease an aging superstar, add some spare parts, and desperately try to unload Bynum because they dont envision him as their future cornerstone.

The Lakers have the talent to win a title, but injuries and egos likely wont let that occur.

And its a roster of not-so-likable guys. Bynum, Kobe, Metta, Barnes (assuming they re-sign him) compared to Paul, Griffin, Butler, Hill- who would you rather let your kids watch?



                
      Back to top
FreaKeyy
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297709by FreaKeyy » Aug 01, 2012 - 11:48 AM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1847
Location: LA
Rep Post +1
votes: 12

Cmon really? The only reason Lakers have some many rings is because they have like one of the best owner. So even though Im a Clipper fan, I gotta go with Buss. I'm really happy that Donald is really spending money to win now.

                
      Back to top
clipperboy24
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297713by clipperboy24 » Aug 01, 2012 - 12:22 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 4657
Rep Post +1
votes: 37

I hate the Lakers but Jim Buss has run them very well and is a great owner.

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297715by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 12:30 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

Jerry Buss>Sterling>Jim Buss

                
      Back to top
PleaseSellDTS
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297716by PleaseSellDTS » Aug 01, 2012 - 12:39 PM PST
Posts: 236
Rep Post +1
votes: 2

^Agreed. Jim Buss has virtually eliminated the scouting operation, from what I have read. Thats bad news for the meduim and distant future. He has adopted a short term strategy to surround Kobe with as much veteran talent as he can, but the future looks bleak right now. Post- Kobe, and absent acquiring Dwight, the Lakers will look much like the post- MJ Bulls. Lots of expensive parts that dont make sense without the superstar.

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297718by tense2 » Aug 01, 2012 - 01:15 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8133
Rep Post +1
votes: 20

Until we actually prove it, it's a moot point.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post Subject: RE: Better Owner- DTS or the Buss Clan? Post ID: 297722by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 01:45 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Sterling gave the Buss family it's start. If Not for Sterling, Bus would never have had the opportunity to own the Lakers. Buss made most of his money off the Lakers. Sterling loaned him the money to buy the team. Granted, Jerry went all in on his investment and made the most of it but it was Sterling who financed the deal.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297725by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 01:52 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

I heard Greta Van Susteren...err...Jimmy Buss uses his old bartending friends as scouts.

                
      Back to top
CP3Best
Post ID: 297726by CP3Best » Aug 01, 2012 - 01:58 PM PST
CTB MVP X1
Posts: 4592
Rep Post +1
votes: 11

Are those his scouts?

                
      Back to top
TheDude
Post ID: 297735by TheDude » Aug 01, 2012 - 02:12 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 2595

wz.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 30

pretty funny thread to start considering OP's screen name. I vote for Buss lol. Not really a close competition IMO. But Sterling has done everything you could ask him for the past couple years except the Olshey thing which has turned out good for us but still was an embarrassment and risky move/non-move.

                
      Back to top
MrHill
Post ID: 297739by MrHill » Aug 01, 2012 - 02:23 PM PST
Clipper Starter
 Avatar

Age: 34
Posts: 603
Location: In the heart of Clipper Country
us.gif

Reputation: 74.1Reputation: 74.1Reputation: 74.1 Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Right...Dr. Buss' main source of income nowadays IS the Lakers. He doesn't nearly have the real estate porfolio that Sterling has to, including his biggest cash cow next to the Lakers--the Forum (which has changed hands a few times since he sold off the building in '99). He also one of the original founding owners of the original Prime Ticket (the channel that's now Fox Sports West) before he sold his stake in the mid-90s.

Once Dr. Buss dies, who knows how much longer his family would hold on to the team (and they only own about 70 percent), once estate taxes kick-in. AEG has the first right of refusal to buy the Lakers outright, but corporations doesn't necessarily make the greatest owners.

Usually when the Lakers go through a down period, it's no more than 3-4 years, but with the way things are going now with the kids running the show, it maybe could go longer, regardless of how much money they'll take in from the Time Warner deal.

To answer the original question, you still gotta give it to the Busses; we only had this one good year, and if the Clips can sustain it for much longer, then it's no question you the better ownership is.

                
      Back to top
PleaseSellDTS
Post ID: 297756by PleaseSellDTS » Aug 01, 2012 - 04:10 PM PST
Posts: 236
Rep Post +1
votes: 2

Pretty subtle, huh?

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297769by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 05:41 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_04

"Greta Van Susteren"

Priceless, Joe!

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297772by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 06:09 PM PST
CTB MVP X3
Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

cleepers wrote:
Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_04

"Greta Van Susteren"

Priceless, Joe!

lol

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297806by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 07:38 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 2362
Rep Post +1
votes: 14

Picking up Steve Nash. Tells me that the Buss family is still by far the better owner. While DTS has improved tremendously. He still has a long time to go before we can truly have any comparison. Especially with what happened with Neil O and not forking the money for a quality coach still leaves a black hole and many questions on how much has DTS really improved. So for now it's definetly still the Buss family. Maybe DTS will catch up in the coming years. But only time will tell.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297820by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 07:54 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

giving 2 unprotected 1st picks along with 2 second rounders for a free agent who could have been gotten for free tells me they got swindled. The Suns are laughing all the way to the draft. If Nash declines, and the Lakers fall from grace ( more than they have), those picks to rebuild are GONE!

All you have to do is look at the Suns' message board to see how they feel about what they got for a player that was already gone with nothing to show for it.

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297821by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 07:56 PM PST
CTB MVP X2


Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

No, it just proves that they're kobe's bitches...

They gave away four draft picks just so that poor little bean can have one last shot at satisfying his MJ-envy... and screwed up their future in the process. Jerry Buss did a lot to show he was a good owner... Jim Buss is a buffoon. Just ask any laker fan.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297825by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:09 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
 Avatar

Posts: 2362
Reputation: 233.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 14

cleepers wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:
Picking up Steve Nash. Tells me that the Buss family is still by far the better owner. While DTS has improved tremendously. He still has a long time to go before we can truly have any comparison. Especially with what happened with Neil O and not forking the money for a quality coach still leaves a black hole and many questions on how much has DTS really improved. So for now it's definetly still the Buss family. Maybe DTS will catch up in the coming years. But only time will tell.

No, it just proves that they're kobe's bitches...

They gave away four draft picks just so that poor little bean can have one last shot at satisfying his MJ-envy... and screwed up their future in the process. Jerry Buss did a lot to show he was a good owner... Jim Buss is a buffoon. Just ask any laker fan.

I don't agree with this at all. Sorry!

I would have done the same thing.

Lakers have never really worried about future. I would rather worry about a Title now than keep worrying about the future. The Clippers have also put a lot in now. They have given up a lot in future. When u have a chance to win now. You go for it! Just like the Clips are finally doing.

                
      Back to top
BACON
Post ID: 297826by BACON » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:10 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1349
Location: Palmdale Ca.
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 5

Shocked

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297827by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:11 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

^ Like Joe said, they could have gotten Nash for free. It's no secret that laker fans are constantly shaking their heads at Jimmy-boy's moves.

                
      Back to top
Jerediscool
Post ID: 297829by Jerediscool » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:16 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 1501
Rep Post +1
votes: 13

They couldnt have afforded him on their own

and i am by no means a lakers supporter but their front office has proven to be better every year. even last year they were able to as deep as we were in the playoffs and then they got better. Buss may suck but DT hasnt exactly proven to be a succesful owner yet.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297832by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:22 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 2362
Rep Post +1
votes: 14

You guy are seriously forgetting that it was impossible to get Nash without a Sign and Trade. The Lakers only Had 3 Mill mid level exception. Nash was offered 36 mil by Toronto. He took 27 mil by the Lakers. I doubt he would have taken any less. The lakers had no choice but to deal with the Suns. I think they did a remarkable job. I am still Jealous that they were able to pull it off. It was the best addition to any team since the CP3 trade. The lakers shocked me and the rest of the world. They have put themselves back into title contenders. If they add D12 you can forget it. The Lakers will be in the finals and probably win it all.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297834by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:25 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 2362
Rep Post +1
votes: 14

Agree and beyond!

                
      Back to top
tense2
Post ID: 297836by tense2 » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:28 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 8133
Reputation: 530.9 Rep Post +1
votes: 20

ClipperSam wrote:
cleepers wrote:
^ Like Joe said, they could have gotten Nash for free. It's no secret that laker fans are constantly shaking their heads at Jimmy-boy's moves.
You guy are seriously forgetting that it was impossible to get Nash without a Sign and Trade. The Lakers only Had 3 Mill mid level exception. Nash was offered 36 mil by Toronto. He took 27 mil by the Lakers. I doubt he would have taken any less. The lakers had no choice but to deal with the Suns. I think they did a remarkable job. I am still Jealous that they were able to pull it off. It was the best addition to any team since the CP3 trade. The lakers shocked me and the rest of the world. They have put themselves back into title contenders. If they add D12 you can forget it. The Lakers will be in the finals and probably win it all.

Your right....this time, lol.

The Lakers were so far over the luxury-tax threshold that the most they could offer Nash as a free agent was $3 million, the "mini" mid-level exception. The only way they could have met his salary request was to absorb him into the Odom traded-player exception, allowing them to acquire a player making $9 million or less next season. The Lakers had until December to use it.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketbal ... 3200.story

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297838by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:32 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
 Avatar

Posts: 7821

us.gif

Reputation: 516.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 90

ClipperSam wrote:
cleepers wrote:
^ Like Joe said, they could have gotten Nash for free. It's no secret that laker fans are constantly shaking their heads at Jimmy-boy's moves.
You guy are seriously forgetting that it was impossible to get Nash without a Sign and Trade. The Lakers only Had 3 Mill mid level exception. Nash was offered 36 mil by Toronto. He took 27 mil by the Lakers. I doubt he would have taken any less. The lakers had no choice but to deal with the Suns. I think they did a remarkable job. I am still Jealous that they were able to pull it off. It was the best addition to any team since the CP3 trade. The lakers shocked me and the rest of the world. They have put themselves back into title contenders. If they add D12 you can forget it. The Lakers will be in the finals and probably win it all.

You're right about the S&T and them not being able to get him otherwise, but they seriously overpaid - both in assets and salary.

Does he make them a better team? absolutely... but calling his acquisition the best since CP3 is stretching it. The only starter he'll make significantly better is Gasol, because he's willing to run the floor, but kobe and Bynum's production will suffer. I'm sure of it.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297839by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:39 PM PST
CTB MVP X3
 Avatar

Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Reputation: 1260.5Reputation: 1260.5Reputation: 1260.5 Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Toronto also gave Fields 20 million dollars. What's your point? That a bottom feeder team overpaying Nash try to and draw him to Toronto was a good deal? What were the Knicks offering?

What you fail to realize, the Lakers payed 27 million dollars, 2 unprotected 1st round picks, and 2 second rounders for a FA. The knicks or any other team were not going to pay that. So because a bottom feeder team was breaking the bank for him means that was the going price for Nash? Seriously, that's what you think? You're right, the Lakers had no choice but to pay. And they paid a big price for Nash. That's doesn't make the Lakers great at recruiting talent, it makes them desperate for talent. The Lakers once again have close to 100 million in salary. If they don't win a title next season, that makes them the stupidest team in the league thinking they can buy a title and lost.

They have a 100 million invested in old players. No future as of now, only 1-2 season window to beat the better teams.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297841by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:41 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

The Clippers have a lot invested now, and the main pieces are young, not old like the Lakers. That's what you're missing in your comparison.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297842by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:42 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
 Avatar

Posts: 2362
Reputation: 233.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 14

cleepers wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:
cleepers wrote:
^ Like Joe said, they could have gotten Nash for free. It's no secret that laker fans are constantly shaking their heads at Jimmy-boy's moves.
You guy are seriously forgetting that it was impossible to get Nash without a Sign and Trade. The Lakers only Had 3 Mill mid level exception. Nash was offered 36 mil by Toronto. He took 27 mil by the Lakers. I doubt he would have taken any less. The lakers had no choice but to deal with the Suns. I think they did a remarkable job. I am still Jealous that they were able to pull it off. It was the best addition to any team since the CP3 trade. The lakers shocked me and the rest of the world. They have put themselves back into title contenders. If they add D12 you can forget it. The Lakers will be in the finals and probably win it all.

You're right about the S&T and them not being able to get him otherwise, but they seriously overpaid - both in assets and salary.

Does he make them a better team? absolutely... but calling his acquisition the best since CP3 is stretching it. The only starter he'll make better is Gasol, because he's willing to run the floor, but kobe and Bynum's production will suffer. I'm sure of it.

Have u seen a better Aquisition for any team that has more impact than Nash since the CP3 trade?

The fact Steve makes them better. Does it matter if Kobes avg Drops or goes up 2-3 Pts. Just the fact that the team will improve.

IMO Nash is the best passer in the game. While its possible that there stats might drop. I don't really see it happening. I think that Bryant's will remain the same in less minutes and a better percentage.

I definetly believe both Bynum and Gasols stats will rise. The team will play much better. We're talking about Steve Frickn Nash here. Come on guys I am not a Laker fan. But we need to be more realistic. There is no doubt to me Nash will improve the entire team!

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297843by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:44 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Well, they're the "Lakers", right? Where there is a will, there is a way...Ask Pat Riley as he was putting the Heatles together. Ask Boston when they got the three amigos. Even the Knicks cleared unmovable contracts to fit in the players they have now. Sure, maybe they couldn't do on their own, but they could have made moves to not pay that high price to get Nash. Cupcake must be slipping.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297844by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:46 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 2362
Rep Post +1
votes: 14

clipper*joe wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:
I don't agree with this at all. Sorry!

I would have done the same thing.

Lakers have never really worried about future. I would rather worry about a Title now than keep worrying about the future. The Clippers have also put a lot in now. They have given up a lot in future. When u have a chance to win now. You go for it! Just like the Clips are finally doing.

The Clippers have a lot invested now, and the main pieces are young, not old like the Lakers. That's what you're missing in your comparison.

Bro are u trying to fool yourself or us?

When the season begins

Hill will be 40 Billups 36 and injured Odom 32 Crawford will turn 33 in March

In my book both teams have old players. So what are u talking about?

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297845by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:51 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Yup, they had TPE to use. Too bad the Suns milked Cupcake for all those picks to play along with them. It's not like the Suns had to take back any contracts to get those picks, it was just a basic swindle..."pay to play" kinda thing. That's my whole point. Sarver coudl have been cool and let him walk for free, but he didn't. he played the Lakers and came out winning knowing Nash was walking anyway.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297847by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:56 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

ClipperSam wrote:

Bro are u trying to fool yourself or us?

When the season begins

Hill will be 40 Billups 36 and injured Odom 32 Crawford will turn 33 in March

In my book both teams have old players. So what are u talking about?

Bro, are you fooling yourself or are you playing a fool?

Hill is a role player making less than 2 million on a 2 year contract. Billups is on a one year deal...Of the books next season Odom is on a one year deal..." " Crawford on a 2 year guaranteed deal.

Just in case you didn't comprehend my simple sentence, here it is again:

Quote:
The Clippers have a lot invested now, and the main pieces are young, not old like the Lakers. That's what you're missing in your comparison.

Who on your list is a MAIN PIECE?! Figure out what I am talking about. I basically gave you the answer.

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297848by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:58 PM PST
CTB MVP X2


Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

The only core player the lakers have under 30 years old is Bynum. Clips have Blake, CP, DJ and an emerging Bledsoe.

Both teams are long in the tooth, but our big minute-eaters are waaaaaaay younger.

Add to that the fact that they were a mediocre defensive team last year and their big additions are both matadors... that tells me that their PPG will rise in direct correlation with how much physical effort they put into running the floor (Nash is not a half-court PG) - expending more energy from their grizzled starters, but their opponents' PPG will rise even more.

                
      Back to top
BACON
Post ID: 297849by BACON » Aug 01, 2012 - 08:58 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
Posts: 1349
Location: Palmdale Ca.
us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 5

LMFAO! lol

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297851by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 09:00 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Seriously, what's hard about this:

"The Clippers have a lot invested now, and the main pieces are young"

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297852by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 09:13 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
 Avatar

Posts: 2362
Reputation: 233.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 14

clipper*joe wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:
You guy are seriously forgetting that it was impossible to get Nash without a Sign and Trade. The Lakers only Had 3 Mill mid level exception. Nash was offered 36 mil by Toronto. He took 27 mil by the Lakers. I doubt he would have taken any less. The lakers had no choice but to deal with the Suns. I think they did a remarkable job. I am still Jealous that they were able to pull it off. It was the best addition to any team since the CP3 trade. The lakers shocked me and the rest of the world. They have put themselves back into title contenders. If they add D12 you can forget it. The Lakers will be in the finals and probably win it all.

Toronto also gave Fields 20 million dollars. What's your point? That a bottom feeder team overpaying Nash try to and draw him to Toronto was a good deal? What were the Knicks offering?

What you fail to realize, the Lakers payed 27 million dollars, 2 unprotected 1st round picks, and 2 second rounders for a FA. The knicks or any other team were not going to pay that. So because a bottom feeder team was breaking the bank for him means that was the going price for Nash? Seriously, that's what you think? You're right, the Lakers had no choice but to pay. And they paid a big price for Nash. That's doesn't make the Lakers great at recruiting talent, it makes them desperate for talent. The Lakers once again have close to 100 million in salary. If they don't win a title next season, that makes them the stupidest team in the league thinking they can buy a title and lost.

They have a 100 million invested in old players. No future as of now, only 1-2 season window to beat the better teams.

And your point is?

Nothing your saying makes any real sense.

The Lakers have once more become real contenders. Your point on Toronto is ridiculous. The bottom line was the Lakers needed to pay Nash.

Nash is a quality pickup and most would agree that the Lakers did what they had to do. In order 2 go after one of the best PGs in the history of the league. The man lead the league in assists at 37. There is no reason to believe that he won't be able to do it again. Buss is looking to win Titles. The Lakers rarely get anyone from the Draft anyways. They found a way to trade Vlade for a man Named Kobe. I am positive that when the times come they will find a way 2 make it happen again. The Lakers have never shyed away from adding quality talent. They are considered one of the best franchises in all of sports. I can only wish that DTS will follow in there footsteps. So that the Clippers can truly be crowned the kings of Los Angeles. ClipperJoe I hate being critical with you. But the more I Read. I am beggining to believe that you are just stuck on trying to be right. Regardless of what topic topic you are discussing. It seems to me that you are a true Clipper Fan. Because you dont seem to have any Valid points on anything that is outside supporting every decision that favors the Clippers.

I love the Clippers! But I won't be blind to reality! I try to find some common ground on your views. But I find it extremely difficult. Because your views are very narrow minded. It is extremely difficult even trying to discuss basketball with you. Because your trying to always be right. No human can be right all the time. I seriously believe that CTB members will lose all respect for your posts. I am trying not to be rude or disrespectful. So I hope you take this in a good way. I just hope you learn to take things more into consideration prior to commenting. The problem is you can't tell when your totally off a topic. Here is hoping that u can try to open up and understand it from a different perspective. One that it more realistic. Would make u a much better poster.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297853by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 09:26 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

That's why I have no real patience with you. Of course it isn't going to make sense to you. Even when it is literally spelled out for you, you can't make sense of it.

Anyway, you have tendency to focus on certain words, and argue a totally different point. We'll see how great the Lakers fair this upcoming season. Paying almost 100 million in salary should win you a title right? We'll see...

                
      Back to top
cleepers
Post ID: 297855by cleepers » Aug 01, 2012 - 09:37 PM PST
CTB MVP X2


Posts: 7821

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 90

^ That $100,000,000 doesn't even include the salaries of their medical staff - who should be asking for a big raise for having to take care of that roster Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_03

With the "jersey ads" coming in the 2013-14 season, and them still having to pay kobe, Gasol, Nash and Artest for that year, I think I may have found the perfect sponsor...

or there's always this one...

...although kobe wearing that at a Nugs home game might scare some of Denver's female fans away.

                
      Back to top
Andrew818
Post ID: 297857by Andrew818 » Aug 01, 2012 - 09:56 PM PST
Clipper Starter


Posts: 755
Rep Post +1
votes: 11

Nash doesn't solve Lakers problems at all.Nash can't stop Westbrook.Westbrook,Harden and Durant are going to be a lot better this year while the Lakers are a year older.Durant,Harden and Westbrook are still improving and now will be coming into the season with Olympic experience which is huge.If Lakers get D12 and he stays healthy than I see the argument but as of now they still lose to OKC.

As far as the topic I agree with who ever said Jerry>Sterling>Jim.When Kobe and Nash retire,which could happen in the next 2 seasons,Lakers have nothing to rebuild with unless they trade for picks.And they are trying to move Bynum for a great player but a player who flip flops.If D12 does sign extention with the Lakers what makes you think he would want to stay when Nash and Kobe retire?So he can play with Metta,Gasol,and Steve Blake...haha.He might demand a trade and then your stuck with a upset Star surrounded by good-mediocre players and no draft picks.

                
      Back to top
TheDude
Post ID: 297858by TheDude » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:11 PM PST
CTB MVP X1


Posts: 2595

wz.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 30

Dude I swear. That you have. A major investment in. A punctuation factory! But I don't know. If it's true!

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297859by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:21 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
 Avatar

Posts: 2362
Reputation: 233.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 14

clipper*joe wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:

And your point is?

Nothing your saying makes any real sense.

That's why I have no real patience with you. Of course it isn't going to make sense to you. Even when it is literally spelled out for you, you can't make sense of it.

Anyway, you have tendency to focus on certain words, and argue a totally different point. We'll see how great the Lakers fair this upcoming season. Paying almost 100 million in salary should win you a title right? We'll see...

Honestly I can care less. I tried to find some common ground. But it is pointless to talk with someone that really has no true arguments. I find most of your threads useless. I rarely see you stick on point. Every thread I read by you is simply trying to misguide the conversation. You Completly change the subject and try to twist the conversation. For example Laundry Fields. Just a mute point. Unfortunately your threads are the ones that I find to be the most unrealistic. Even when I tried to find something positive in your posts. It's like trying to find a needle in a hay stack. The funny thing is contrary to what u think I have nothing against you. Other than your ideas that are way off when it comes to topics relating to basketball. While some might enjoy you trashing anything that is not in support of what the Clippers do and there front office. I most definetly am not. I enjoy honesty, realism and truth in regards to the Clippers and there true chances. I can't deal with unrealistic views of someone that is clearly blinded.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297861by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:29 PM PST
CTB MVP X3
 Avatar

Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Reputation: 1260.5Reputation: 1260.5Reputation: 1260.5 Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Wow, I'm useless but you're the guy spitting out crap about being able to get Brand off of waivers and saying Jerry West drafted Bynum and Marc Gasol? If I'm useless, what does that make you? Worthless?

You never use facts in a discussion. You make stuff up as you go along. Instead of having a decent argument with you, it seems I have to waste time teaching, or explaining things to you.

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297862by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:35 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

Really think that? Not that I give a flying frack about respect on a message board but I think you're more consumed with that. I'll let my POV speak for me while you tell david why your big star turned to 2 smaller ones in your reputation under your avatar.

                
      Back to top
Andrew818
Post ID: 297864by Andrew818 » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:39 PM PST
Clipper Starter
 Avatar

Posts: 755
Reputation: 42.5Reputation: 42.5 Rep Post +1
votes: 11

clipper*joe wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:
Picking up Steve Nash. Tells me that the Buss family is still by far the better owner. While DTS has improved tremendously. He still has a long time to go before we can truly have any comparison. Especially with what happened with Neil O and not forking the money for a quality coach still leaves a black hole and many questions on how much has DTS really improved. So for now it's definetly still the Buss family. Maybe DTS will catch up in the coming years. But only time will tell.

giving 2 unprotected 1st picks along with 2 second rounders for a free agent who could have been gotten for free tells me they got swindled. The Suns are laughing all the way to the draft. If Nash declines, and the Lakers fall from grace ( more than they have), those picks to rebuild are GONE!

All you have to do is look at the Suns' message board to see how they feel about what they got for a player that was already gone with nothing to show for it.

I completely agree.Suns won big in the deal.Not only did they get much younger,they also have more then enough to rebuild.Also their team now isn't that bad. PG-Dragic/Marshall/Telfair SG-Brown/W.Johnson SF-Beasley/Dudley PF-Scola/Morris C-Gortat/Fry Not contenders for sure but a solid group of guys.

                
      Back to top
ClipperSam
Post ID: 297865by ClipperSam » Aug 01, 2012 - 10:49 PM PST
Clipper All-Star
 Avatar

Posts: 2362
Reputation: 233.8 Rep Post +1
votes: 14

clipper*joe wrote:
ClipperSam wrote:

Honestly I can care less. I tried to find some common ground. But it is pointless to talk with someone that really has no true arguments. I find most of your threads useless. I rarely see you stick on point. Every thread I read by you is simply trying to misguide the conversation. You Completly change the subject and try to twist the conversation. For example Laundry Fields. Just a mute point. Unfortunately your threads are the ones that I find to be the most unrealistic. Even when I tried to find something positive in your posts. It's like trying to find a needle in a hay stack. The funny thing is contrary to what u think I have nothing against you. Other than your ideas that are way off when it comes to topics relating to basketYball. While some might enjoy you trashing anything that is not in support of what the Clippers do and there front office. I most definetly am not. I enjoy honesty, realism and truth in regards to the Clippers and there true chances. I can't deal with unrealistic views of someone that is clearly blinded.

Wow, I'm useless but you're the guy spitting out crap about being able to get Brand off of waivers and saying Jerry West drafted Bynum and Marc Gasol? If I'm useless, what does that make you? Worthless?

You never use facts in a discussion. You make stuff up as you go along. Instead of having a decent argument with you, it seems I have to waste time teaching, or explaining things to you.

I think your great when pointing out details. But your horrible about remaining on point concerning any topic. Again anyone that reads the posts knows that I was not concerned about who was the person who drafted them. The main topic was how the Lakers Drafted the players. If the topic was Jerry West than your argument makes more sense. Since the topic had nothing to do with West other than displaying Laker past Draft picks.

Like I said you need to look past muted details and understand the conversation. Something u simply have displayed u can not comprehend. Like I said the fact that you are good at pointing out minor details does not sum up the major topic that is being spoken about. It just shows that you try to find any minor error or typo to prove your point. Most readers understand that it does not effect the topic. Clearly again trying to point this out is useless.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post ID: 297868by jarca » Aug 01, 2012 - 11:27 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7364

rp.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

jim buss worst year (2nd round) playoff is sterling's best year. if iam not mistaken didnt buss won back to back in 09-10. until sterling wins a championship buss>sterling not even close

                
      Back to top
clipper*joe
Post ID: 297870by clipper*joe » Aug 01, 2012 - 11:34 PM PST
CTB MVP X3


Posts: 14814
Location: los angeles
calif.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 120

I agree but I am surprised you haven't called Sterling cheap lately.

                
      Back to top
jarca
Post ID: 297872by jarca » Aug 01, 2012 - 11:37 PM PST
CTB MVP X2
Posts: 7364

rp.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 35

clipper*joe wrote:
jarca wrote:
jim buss worst year (2nd round) playoff is sterling's best year. if iam not mistaken didnt buss won back to back in 09-10. until sterling wins a championship buss>sterling not even close

I agree but I am surprised you haven't called Sterling cheap lately.

comparing to buss he's cheap.

                
      Back to top
MrB
Post ID: 297878by MrB » Aug 01, 2012 - 11:52 PM PST
Clipper All-Star


Posts: 2433

us.gif

Rep Post +1
votes: 18

Buss has had the Lakers in the playoffs so many years you can't really compare him to DTS. DTS has been a cellar dweller for years but has seemed to make more right then wrong decisions of late. Past 8 years or so by my calculations. The Clippers have a long way to go and IMO should not be compared to the Lakers right now. We need to give it more time and see how things play out in the next 5 to 10 years.

                
      Back to top
PleaseSellDTS
Post ID: 297941by PleaseSellDTS » Aug 02, 2012 - 04:42 PM PST
Posts: 236
Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7Reputation: 14.7 Rep Post +1
votes: 2

OK, I get the deep history lesson, it's no contest. Maybe I didnt tee this up very well for ya'll. Let me try again.

TODAY, if you were a decent NBA caliber shooter or defender and were being recruited as a role player who would you rather play for ... DTS or the current Buss braintrust? And more to the point, which team would you rather sign a 3 year contract with?

Here's one scenario: In 3 years, barring a major injury, Kobe's skills will have further diminished and he has become an ok defender and a jump shooter. Nash will be done. Bynum may well be traded or sign elsewhere and even if he's around, his motivation and A game shows up sporadically. Gasol is still a decent player but on the decline as well. The Lakers have a very old team and no money to spend until Kobe retires.

The Clippers on the other hand ... now have a developed superstar just entering his prime with excellent low post moves and can play passable defense, a monster big man defender in the middle, still one of the best point gaurds in the league, the best 6th man in the league (Bledsoe) who eats second team guards for lunch, all surrounded by a cast of shooters and defenders.

3 decades of Laker history tell me to sign there, but very recent history and current circumstances say pick the Clips ... and that's exactly what happended this summer.

                
      Back to top
Go To the Top of the ThreadGo Home

or Comment Using FB

Post new topic   Reply to topic
← John Ireland interviews Blake about contract extension Log in to check your private messages → Remaining Free Agents


← John Ireland interviews Blake about contract extension

→ Remaining Free Agents

Related Topics
Topic Replies Posted
No new posts Sterling The Longest Tenured NBA Owner Currently 10 May 29, 2013 - 07:32 PM
No new posts Jerry Buss Passes Away - RIP [updated] 47 Feb 15, 2013 - 03:33 PM
No new posts Son of Clippers Owner Donald Sterling Found Dead 27 Jan 02, 2013 - 08:17 AM
No new posts DTS might not be the worst owner after all 26 Jul 18, 2012 - 04:02 AM
No new posts Del Negro's fate rests with owner 175 May 25, 2012 - 06:10 AM


register
You are an anonymous user- Register now!


Follow our Los Angeles Clippers RSS Feed, plus the Clippers Rumors RSS Feed, the LA Clippers News RSS feed, and the Clippers Forum RSS feed to get the newest updated Clippers News and Trade Rumors plus Clippers Game update in your RSS/XML reader!